Take a look at the email that starts on Page 11. Are the processors that are working behind the scenes on this foreclosure admitting that they are misrepresenting to the court what party really owns this loan and who has the right to foreclose?
Now, at least according to the pleadings, and as far as the court knows, Deutsche Bank is entitled to collect this money and there is an affidavit…(that’s a sworn legal pleading) that swears $200,000 is owed to Deutsche Bank. But the emails on Page 11 assert, “We have the Plaintiff as US Bank”. Now, what does this mean?
And what does it mean when they assert that the bid can be assigned after the fact?
Look closely at that email on Page 11….
Seems like another big phat “OOPSIE DAISY” sure didn’t need to let the court see these emails…..
Which again begs the question….how many times is this going on?
You read the emails, you decide.
It certainly cannot be determined here, just by these emails, but it sure would be neat to do discovery and ask the question, “Please provide every instance in which you suspected or it was determined that a loan was not in fact owned or held by the trust or plaintiff that was foreclosing and provide documents that detail how this error or oversight was corrected.”