If Florida’s judges, Constitutional officers as they are, became aware that in a significant percentage of the cases that pass their benches, the banks were ripping off the State of Florida? Would the judges have a duty to not allow the foreclosures to continue?
And no, I’m not talking about fraud or forgery or robo signing or any of the other crimes that are so well documented, I’m talking about a new scam that has become apparent. A scam so bold, so arrogant, so persistent that, well….only a banker and their foreclosure mill attorneys would contemplate carrying it out. It’s not at all complex. It’s just another one of those things that’s so blatant, so simple that no one ever thought to look at it.
Now granted, it’s gone unchecked under my radar screen for years and I don’t know of any other foreclosure defense attorney who’s raised the issue. There are very few appellate cases on the issue….only one directly on point. But in each of those cases, and in every time I’ve brought it before a judge….the judges have agreed with me…..
NO FORECLOSURE FOR YOU BANK UNTIL YOU FIX YOUR PROBLEM!
Now, like most defenses, it’s not a free house. Heck, it’s not even a defense really as much as it is a responsibility that the banks have been ignoring…..and we’ve all been letting them get away with it. It’s simply a requirement that banks play by the rules before they use our state resources.
But as our state’s court system continues on this mad dash to grant foreclosure judgments to those irresponsible and downright criminal organizations known as the banks, mark my words…
The banks are pulling a scam over our courts, our judges, our legislature and on every single taxpayer in this state!
Our state’s court budgets are cut every year. And our courts, rather than stand up tall, proud and powerful. Rather than exercise their status a co equal branches of government and force the legislative and executive branches to show us the respect that we are entitled to, our courts just bend and bow, subservient.
If a Foreclosing Plaintiff did not pay the correct, statutorily-mandated filing fee, the Clerk of Court would not issue a Final Judgement of Foreclosure until that fee is paid. I this new area, our judges should not be using precious taxpayer resources to reward the banks….and they certainly should not be rewarding the banks with title to properties, because they have:
Systematically, Repetitively And Knowingly Ripped Off Our State In Foreclosure Cases
Most Banks are ripping off the US Constitution.
Section. 10.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
AND LETS NOT FORGET ABOUT THEIR IMPROPER FILINGS :
MOVING THE CASE TO DISTRICT BANKRUPTCY COURT WHEN THE HOMEOWNER HAS NEVER FILED BK !
# 2 Having nothing to proof they are the landlord ,
# 3 To file an unlawful detainer against a homeowner NOT A TENANT.
NOT A RENTER
NO LANDLORD / TENANT RELATIONSHIP
in violation of 1538-1598 in California.
Marlene vs. Brown ?
I have a list a mile long and can’t find it right now.
Make sure you GIVE TO THE COURTS A COPY IOF WHAT WAS FILED UNDER THE DEED OF TRUST THEY ARE FRAUDCLOSING ON YOUR HOME WITH,
CHANCES ARE THEY FILED DIFFERENT FRAUDCLOSER ONES,ONES NOT SO OBVIOUS TO THE INTENTIONAL FRAUD AND THE INVALIDITY.
OF THESE DOT’S , THIS TIME PERHAPS:
ON a LEGAL FORM DEED OF TRUST
# 2 PERHAPS HAND DATED
# 3 SAME DATE AS NOTARY
# NO 7 YEAR GAP FROM DOC DATE TO RECORDATION
# ROBO-SIGNOR HAND DATED AND DID NOT SIGN THEIR REAL NAME
# A REALISTIC DATE NOT ONE 3 YEARS FROM NOW
# NO ALTERED INSTRUMENT # ( THEY WERE ACTUALLY RECORDED
UNDER A DIFFERENT INSTRUMENT # TO CONCEAL WHAT HAS
REALLY BEEN DONE TO THE PROPERTY’S IN THEM.
tRUONES THAT ARE BETTER ,
* A LITTLE LESS INVALID ,
* MAYBE HAND DATED
MAYBE SAME DATE AS THE NOTARY HAND DATED ON A SEPERATE POAGE ALL BYITSELF
Matt ,
The courts don’t care ,, I filed suit halting 15 sales 2 or 3 years ago in Orlando (ninja9) using the same argument , failure to pay the required $100 fee for a foreign corp. ,,, Orlando still doesn’t enforce it … they consider it “optional” … maybe we could come up with an automated system to scan the dockets for plaintiff name and fees paid and file amicus notices to the courts that fees have not been paid … maybe we could file suit against the clerks for accepting suits or scheduling cases when fees haven’t been paid …