Foreclosure Defense Florida

The Banks Have a MAJOR PROBLEM….As Many As One Quarter of Foreclosure Cases Pending Are Based on UNENFORCEABLE DOCUMENTS!

Next week promises to be very busy in my office.
And the week after that, and the week after that.
Weeks ago we filed dozens of motions seeking to have foreclosure cases dismissed.   In the next several weeks, those motions will be heard.   In the previous hearings where this motion has been heard, courts across this area of the state have agreed on several important points….

1. This is a completely new reason to dismiss foreclosures;

2. How dare the banks;

3. CASE DISMISSED.

I’m not so interested in my cases where this issue is being brought up, argued and resolved. I’m most interested in all those cases, tens of thousands of them across this state, where this issue is not being brought up or addressed.

The banks have an obligation to bring this issue to the court’s attention, but they are NOT DOING SO!

And the fact that they know about this now.   I’ve run this motion across many different servicers, and many different law firms.   My question to them, whether I win or lose the motion is…

ARE YOU NOW GOING BACK, CORRECTING THIS WRONGDOING AND ADVISING YOUR CLIENT AND COURTS IN TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CASES OF YOUR ON-GOING MISDEEDS?

The answer of course is, “no”.   They continue marching on.   Each case in which this occurs is not just a void judgment, it’s a crime.   And the longer this goes on, the more Final Judgments that are entered, the worse this will become.

But the banks and their law firms cannot just walk away from this.   It’s not like the lying testimony of the banks and their robo witnesses, lies and perjury spewing out of their mouths on a regular basis, only to evaporate into the air, with no court reporter to record the on-going crime spree.

This crime spree is locked right into the documents filed, in tens or hundreds of thousands of foreclosure cases sitting in courtrooms all across this state…between the Complaint and the Final Judgment you will see the crimes, right there in black and white…..for all the world to see.

Mighten we just sit tight and slow this foreclosure train down just a bit?

5 Comments

  • jerry says:

    what is the issue you are bring to the attention of banks and servicers, you have us all a twitter.

  • Toby Tobias says:

    Can you please post pleading details so we can see the factors you are addressing?
    THANKS!!

  • JANE LETWIN says:

    MATT, I AM LOOKING FOR A LAWYER LIKE YOU TO HANDLE A CLASS ACTION SUIT BY A TENANT/HOUSE-SITTER-PET-SITTER IN LAKE WORTH FLORIDA- THE PLAINTIFF IS ME- THE CORE SUIT IS HSBC AND THEY DO NOT HAVE THE DOCS- BUT THEY HAVE RAMMED THE SUIT THROUGH THE PALM BEACH CIRCUIT COURT WITH UNCONSCIONABLE MOTIONS AND LIES TO JUDGES WHO APPEAR TO BE MORE THAN WILLING TO LISTEN AND AGREE- MATT- I WILL FILE THIS SUIT ON MY OWN IF NEED BE, BUT I PREFER TO HAVE IT CARRIED BY A PRO LIKE YOU.
    PLEASE LET ME KNOW ASAP IF YOU ARE INTERESTED.
    I CAN FILE PRO SE AND YOU MIGHT SIGN ON WHEN YOU HAVE ENOUGH INFO TO DO THAT.
    SINCERELY, JANE LETWIN
    FYI – I HAVEN’T BEEN REINSTATED TO THE BAR YET BUT I HAVE A MOTION PENDING IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLA.

  • Jon says:

    If this is so revolutionary, why not post the argument or at least the rough basis for the argument? I am not sure how the above helps the tens of thousands of cases out there you state you are most concerned with, and not your own.
    It sounds like an infomercial- its revolutionary, its cool, its now, oh but you cant really own it.
    If you say it in court the “greedy bank lawyers” will have heard it and its open court, and they have already read your motion served on them. There is no harm posting it here.
    I remember a previous post with “revolutionary” new affirmative defenses that was a blank post never updated. Is this merely to drive traffic to your site or are there really new arguments that could help people that are losing their properties to summary judgments every day that could have used these arguments?

  • Shanda Miller says:

    Matt, please give us a heads up on this deficiency in the quarter of these foreclosure cases. Now this article, on the heels of last month vagueness. Matt, you are very much appreciated. I spoke to you last year in 6th judical, introduced you to my mother, told her about your good works. You said the BAR and courts didn’t think so. I told you we would be behind you 1000%. Many of us are under tremendous stress. We could be looking for specifics right now whilst the State court represents as counsel for the law firms. Please, help. Please point us as to what to look for.

Leave a Reply