Great job to Lisa at Foreclosure Hamlet for picking up on this one….
Have a look first at the curious chain of endorsements….
Now look at excerpts from the court docket:
34 | MOT – MOTION |
Filing Date: | 13-OCT-2010 | ||
Filing Party: | GMAC B ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, | ||
Disposition Amount: | |||
Docket Text: | TO RATIFY FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE NUNC PRO TUNC |
38 | COFS – CERTIFICATE OF SALE |
Filing Date: | 04-NOV-2010 | ||
Filing Party: | |||
Disposition Amount: | |||
Docket Text: | SOLD TO PLTF FOR $23,400.00 |
36 | MOT – MOTION |
Filing Date: | 05-NOV-2010 | ||
Filing Party: | GMAC B ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, | ||
Disposition Amount: | |||
Docket Text: | TO CANCEL FORECLOSURE SALE. |
And finally, one of the most curious pleadings in the history of court pleadings, the Motion to Ratify Judgment….
Motion to Ratify Summary Judgment-1
Is there any precedent in the entire recorded history of our court system? What exactly does this mean and who dreamt it up? Will appeallate courts buy this and will title insurance companies rely on these? And here’s another thing that troubles me. These motions assert that the affidavits were not properly verified…other versions of this motion cite the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct Rule and duty of candor towards the tribunal. Some of us think we know what was happening with these affidavits, but has there ever been any hearing on this? Has there ever been a deposition taken to ascertain exactly what the details of the improper conduct were? How can judges ratify a judgment when they have no idea what conduct they are ratifying?
Finally, I want to know….are the Collados out in the street? And what happens to the third party bidder who was bidding at this foreclosure sale? What about the taxpayer dollars that will be spent on all this sale cancelling and motions to ratify and all the other detritus that is now clogging our courtrooms?