<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mortgage Modification Fraud Continues Unchecked in Florida</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/03/mortgage-modification-fraud-continues-unchecked-in-florida/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/03/mortgage-modification-fraud-continues-unchecked-in-florida/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mortgage-modification-fraud-continues-unchecked-in-florida</link>
	<description>Speaking Out As Long As Political Speech Remains Protected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:23:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Bowen</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/03/mortgage-modification-fraud-continues-unchecked-in-florida/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=982#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>I handled a FDUTPA case a couple of years ago and generally speaking the plaintiff is entitled to attorney&#039;s fees and costs.I&#039;m not certain, but I believe that the Foreclosure Fraud Rescue Act would also provide for fees and costs.  I think the type of cases you describe probably warrants a civil suit.

www.facebook.com/MediatorKen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I handled a FDUTPA case a couple of years ago and generally speaking the plaintiff is entitled to attorney&#8217;s fees and costs.I&#8217;m not certain, but I believe that the Foreclosure Fraud Rescue Act would also provide for fees and costs.  I think the type of cases you describe probably warrants a civil suit.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/MediatorKen" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/MediatorKen</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

