<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Banks Often Have No Idea Who Has The Right To Foreclose On Your Home- But That Doesn&#8217;t Stop Them From Trying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/the-banks-often-have-no-idea-who-has-the-right-to-foreclose-on-your-home-but-that-doesnt-stop-them-from-trying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/the-banks-often-have-no-idea-who-has-the-right-to-foreclose-on-your-home-but-that-doesnt-stop-them-from-trying/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-banks-often-have-no-idea-who-has-the-right-to-foreclose-on-your-home-but-that-doesnt-stop-them-from-trying</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:10:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Acosta</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/the-banks-often-have-no-idea-who-has-the-right-to-foreclose-on-your-home-but-that-doesnt-stop-them-from-trying/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>David Acosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=713#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Few things will change until appellate courts  begin getting these cases and correct this behavior.  

Would you like to waive a case in front of the judges that put an exclamation point on your argument?  In this case the foreclosing plaintiff misrepresented their right of action for nearly three (3) years while the judge continuously threatened the pro se litigant that he would eventually lose and have to pay higher attorneys&#039; fees.  Then the battle-worn plaintiff files an affidavit admitting that 2 1/2 years prior to bringing the action they had sold the loan to another company and had no right, title or interest in the promissory note subject of the foreclosure action.  Summary judgment for the defendant.  Affirmed by the District Court.  Let me know if you would like that case.

This IS important to judges.  Some more than others.

BTW, Matt, I reached out to you by email but never got a response.  You probably did not get the message.  Please contact me at your convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few things will change until appellate courts  begin getting these cases and correct this behavior.  </p>
<p>Would you like to waive a case in front of the judges that put an exclamation point on your argument?  In this case the foreclosing plaintiff misrepresented their right of action for nearly three (3) years while the judge continuously threatened the pro se litigant that he would eventually lose and have to pay higher attorneys&#8217; fees.  Then the battle-worn plaintiff files an affidavit admitting that 2 1/2 years prior to bringing the action they had sold the loan to another company and had no right, title or interest in the promissory note subject of the foreclosure action.  Summary judgment for the defendant.  Affirmed by the District Court.  Let me know if you would like that case.</p>
<p>This IS important to judges.  Some more than others.</p>
<p>BTW, Matt, I reached out to you by email but never got a response.  You probably did not get the message.  Please contact me at your convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>