<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreclosure Case Killer- The Subpoena Duces Tecum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum</link>
	<description>Speaking Out As Long As Political Speech Remains Protected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:23:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew D. Weidner, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/comment-page-1/#comment-52953</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew D. Weidner, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=868#comment-52953</guid>
		<description>i find all this multi party plaintiff strategy to be deeply troubling and problematic....not viable and potential very harmful to consumers...but I only practice in florida and provide no advice anywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i find all this multi party plaintiff strategy to be deeply troubling and problematic&#8230;.not viable and potential very harmful to consumers&#8230;but I only practice in florida and provide no advice anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/comment-page-1/#comment-52865</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=868#comment-52865</guid>
		<description>Did you write, &quot;Are You a Victim of Wells Fargo&#039;s Pain&quot;  What did you find out in your research?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you write, &#8220;Are You a Victim of Wells Fargo&#8217;s Pain&#8221;  What did you find out in your research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/comment-page-1/#comment-52864</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=868#comment-52864</guid>
		<description>Ray,

My loan was also assigned to Kondaur by Wells Fargo.  I found out that the Assignment was signed by a robosigner.  Jeff Barnes of www.foreclosuredefensenationwide.com is willing to do a multiplaintiff action against Kondaur if we can find enough people to share their stories and join in.  Please contact me at 
805-451-4040 to discuss this further.  If anyone else has been a victim of Kondaur Capital, please contact me or e-mail tiffany@wjbarneslaw.com  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray,</p>
<p>My loan was also assigned to Kondaur by Wells Fargo.  I found out that the Assignment was signed by a robosigner.  Jeff Barnes of <a href="http://www.foreclosuredefensenationwide.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.foreclosuredefensenationwide.com</a> is willing to do a multiplaintiff action against Kondaur if we can find enough people to share their stories and join in.  Please contact me at<br />
805-451-4040 to discuss this further.  If anyone else has been a victim of Kondaur Capital, please contact me or e-mail <a href="mailto:tiffany@wjbarneslaw.com">tiffany@wjbarneslaw.com</a>  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/comment-page-1/#comment-36106</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=868#comment-36106</guid>
		<description>i have a question.. i did not file my answer/affirmative defense, however i have, for the past 18 months been able to get granted continuances on the fact that i m enrolled and in litigation for a loan modification with wellsfargo. it has to date worked, however i know this cant go on forever and month after month i am being requested more and more information from the modification department which can not seem make a decision in over 2 yrs, now the plaintiffs attorneys have filed another affidavit of amounts due and owing, this time i want to file a motion to strike based on the fact that the affiant is not the custodian among other reasons that i have discovered! i want to know if i should file the affirmative defense first then the motion to strike or at this point just the motion to strike?? please help you seem to be rite on!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a question.. i did not file my answer/affirmative defense, however i have, for the past 18 months been able to get granted continuances on the fact that i m enrolled and in litigation for a loan modification with wellsfargo. it has to date worked, however i know this cant go on forever and month after month i am being requested more and more information from the modification department which can not seem make a decision in over 2 yrs, now the plaintiffs attorneys have filed another affidavit of amounts due and owing, this time i want to file a motion to strike based on the fact that the affiant is not the custodian among other reasons that i have discovered! i want to know if i should file the affirmative defense first then the motion to strike or at this point just the motion to strike?? please help you seem to be rite on!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FORECLOSURE CASE KILLERS &#124; Challenge Your Lender</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/comment-page-1/#comment-31431</link>
		<dc:creator>FORECLOSURE CASE KILLERS &#124; Challenge Your Lender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=868#comment-31431</guid>
		<description>[...] http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/" rel="nofollow">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FORECLOSURE CASE KILLERS</title>
		<link>http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/comment-page-1/#comment-31110</link>
		<dc:creator>FORECLOSURE CASE KILLERS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/?p=868#comment-31110</guid>
		<description>[...] http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/" rel="nofollow">http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2010/02/foreclosure-case-killer-the-subpoena-duces-tecum/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

